As the Rio Olympics captivate sports fans worldwide, tremendous branding opportunities, and potential pitfalls, for companies (official Olympic sponsors or not) and athletes abound.
Craig Howe, CEO and Founder of Rebel Ventures was kind enough to lend his digital expertise and discuss why these Rio Olympics are different than any other Games due to the abundance of live digital content and the impact this will have on athletes and brands as they engage with global audiences on the biggest stage in sports.
Craig is a leader in the digital sports realm as Rebel Ventures is a sports digital strategy and tech venture firm that helps global sports brands maneuver today’s shifting digital media landscapes and execute strategic planning and engagement with social savvy audiences. Some of the brands that Rebel Ventures has provided digital guidance for include the Golden State Warriors, Real Madrid, Chicago Bulls, Boston Red Sox, San Francisco 49ers, to name a few.
What do you classify as extreme overuse of social media and digital media? And how might this hurt the Olympic viewing experience for fans either on digital platforms or on television?
Craig Howe: The way that this story has been unfolding has been really fascinating to me. I did quite a few interviews around Sochi when the #SochiProblems hashtag started to trend. At that time you didn’t have Facebook Live video or Periscope where pretty much anyone can become a live broadcaster. Therefore, a lot of the coverage that we saw around Sochi was images of people having different experiences. There was a bobsledder who had to break through the bathroom door because he got locked in. So it’s one thing to show that in an image and one still picture and it’s a whole other ballgame when you’re able to actually broadcast live.
…With no phone to call for help, I used my bobsled push training to break out. #SochiJailBreak pic.twitter.com/apZRefgvCO
— Johnny Quinn (@JohnnyQuinnUSA) February 8, 2014
As we know, Brazil is a fairly heavy internet and social media laden society so with the social media tools available there is a combination of now having tools where anyone can become a reporter, especially olympic athletes, and live broadcaster and with athletes who are really used to, especially Olympic athletes, having their income stem from building their own personal brand and followings. So my big fear as we move through the Olympics was that every brand and athlete would be using live video to the point where the oversaturation is so heavy that you don’t really know who to follow.
In some ways it’s a digital consumption dream but in a lot of ways it’s really hard to break out of the clutter when everyone is trying to use the same mediums. Now that so many brands and athletes see digital as a primary way to cover the Games and to showcase their involvement I was expecting extreme overuse of social. However, kind of a funny thing happened. If you look at the actual rules, it says that no unofficial Olympic sponsors can associate with the Olympics on Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram. Athletes can be disqualified or stripped of medals if they violate a rule of using social media during the Olympics and there is a big black out period for that. That was really my big fear for heading into the Olympics; that it might be really hard for anyone to stand out because everyone is going to be so proactively using digital and social means to communicate their story.
Then with all of the trouble around Brazil from the Zika virus to unsafe water conditions to the status of their economy, I think the IOC really is really using strict social media guidelines as a way to kind of prohibit the amount of coverage that people are going to have from athletes all the way down to brands around the Olympics. This totally changes the paradigm of the conversation where I think everyone was initially worried about overuse and now it feels like an unbelievably controlled environment in social media.
What do you think this influx of new digital and social media platforms, such as a Facebook Live or a Periscope, will provide for brands and athletes that we haven’t seen before at Olympic Games?
CH; I would say that with Periscope and Facebook Live you really have the opportunity to convey the emotion that the athletes go through. I can’t even imagine intensely training for something for four years and it all leads to that one moment. And these are not highly paid elite athletes. In most cases, these are people that hold down full time jobs and train on pure passion.
NBC is doing a record amount of coverage across all channels, which is fantastic. They will own those live moments. But I think the ideal media experience is to feel the emotion of the athletes. That’s why I think the moratorium and the limitations that were put on by the IOC are so fascinating. Because now that you actually have the tools to really see and capture the emotion and have brands and everyone that’s watching around the world kind of feed off the energy and all of the positives that can happen, these limitations will change what fans are actually exposed to, which side of the Rio Olympic story the IOC wants us to see. We have all of the technology now to take it to another level in terms of capturing great content.
Are there any brands or athletes that impressed you with their digital content production?
CH: I was really inspired by what Under Armour did with Michael Phelps because I feel like what is never really showcased enough is the level of training and intensity that goes into preparing for these moments. All that Under Armour did across traditional and digital kind of gave me goosebumps.
That’s a brand that really got out early and basically owned the Olympic conversation and the story about what goes into making the Olympics. They were way ahead of the window this year. I feel like a lot of brands and athletes try to hold a lot of content right before the Games happen because they think that people are not going to really see what is going on. But I give a lot of credit to Under Armour for getting out there early with a very powerful message that the Olympics are coming. They were also tipping their hat to the athletes that have been working so hard that they actually put that ad out months before the Games even started.
For brands that are not an official sponsor of the Olympics, and therefore have limitations on their messaging capabilities, how do they still take advantage of the Olympics in a meaningful way?
CH: This might be because I’m a big Bleacher Report fan but did you see what they did on the last day of the NBA season with Kobe’s last game plus the Warriors 73rd win? They finished in the number one spot on social in one of the biggest days in sports history. I found it so fascinating because if you look at Bleacher Report, they don’t have rights. They are just a third party like any brand or media company. But they did a video series on Instagram for Kobe which was fantastic. They did a whole thing on Twitter about Kobe breaking Twitter and a bunch of gifs and memes and hashtags such as #MambaOut and #73. They also did a ton of graphics around it and I just felt that this is applicable to the Olympics this year.
Which by the way, I realize that the IOC is strict with their brand as they are just trying to protect their partners and get the most out of their involvement. But what I really love about the creativity in social media is really savvy, really well staffed, really creative and graphically driven brands will find ways to take advantage of the limitations and evolve the conversation to where it doesn’t fit within the official narrative but it fits within the narrative that the social media world creates.
So I really look to see how every brand and athlete, that is watching in some way, is going to be able to take advantage of these great moments without violating any of the IOC policies. I think Bleacher Report is a perfect example of that.
How did the governmental and health issues facing Brazil impact the digital landscape around these Olympics for brands and athletes?
CH: With the IOC saying that athletes can be disqualified or even stripped of medals if they violate the rules, I think they are basically communicating that they learned from the past. With the #SochiProblems hashtag I believe that the organizations that are heavily invested in the Olympics are doing what they can to minimize negatives and focus on the positives this year.
What happened in Sochi was so intriguing to me because going into the Games, everyone was saying ‘this is such a disaster and there are all these problems.’ But a funny thing happened, as soon as the Games started the stories from the competition started to totally take over. Rio has definitely been facing issues in the press for months. But I hope that once the action continues and the Olympic spirit takes over then the competition stories will come out and digital media and NBC, with their record amount of coverage across so many platforms, will become the focus. This will just make Rio another host of great Olympic moments.
Is there anything about Rio specifically that gives it unique digital possibilities compared to previous Olympic host cities?
CH: Absolutely. During Sochi if you look at T. J. Oshie, who is a player for the Washington Capitals, he and his wife noticed that there were many stray dogs in Sochi. So they actually brought one home and chronicled the whole journey on digital. That was one of those memories where you see people that aren’t just going to the Olympics for the time that they are participating. They actually find a way to connect with the city. Oshie is a unique example but I feel that the more the brands and athletes can connect with the people of Rio, they can really show that being in Brazil during this economic time and bringing smiles to people’s faces by knowing and supporting the community gives you all the feels and really has impact.
Excited to get home to @laurencosgrove3 and this little maniac. #bopo #lillybellacharlie #USA pic.twitter.com/RMSAiGRUEc
— TJ Oshie (@TJOshie77) February 23, 2014
So I’m hoping that brands and athletes can really go beyond the realms of their Olympic village and into the community and just discover some good relationships.
What specifically from a digital content perspective should we be watching for with athletes telling their stories?
CH: I’m really looking for how athletes tell their story before and after the Games and how long the halo effect can carry on for athletes in their digital and social presence. How long can they capitalize and extend the great moments of victory or the moments of not performing as well as they thought? That’s what I’m really keeping an eye on before and after these Olympics. Now that we have more technology and more ways that we can share experiences around the Olympics as an athlete and a brand, is that window of coverage and the window of connection with fans going to be longer with more digital options available?
It wasn’t so long ago that an athlete’s goal at the Olympics was to get on the cereal box. But now, if you’re an athlete, you want to get a million followers. That’s the modern version of being on the cover of the cereal box.